Does eating processed meats cause colorectal cancer?

January 17, 2023

However, many of us have heard about a link between processed meats and colorectal cancer, which kills more than 5000 Australians each year. Is this just a myth, or are we putting ourselves at increased cancer risk by including processed meats in our diet? Ultimately the IARC classified processed meat as a carcinogen, meaning they found sufficient evidence that eating processed meats causes colorectal cancer. This means that while there is strong evidence that eating processed meats causes colorectal cancer, the actual impact on cancer risk is relatively small. Reducing colorectal cancer riskAlthough eating salami may not be as dangerous as smoking cigarettes or breathing in asbestos particles, it does contribute to cancer.

Processed meats are a staple in Australian diets, but according to experts at UNSW Sydney they contribute to cancer risk.

They’re integral to summer, as ubiquitous as a zinced-up nose or a backyard cricket game. From December onwards, walk into any gathering and processed meats are being served. It’s the bacon sizzling on the barbecue, the cured ham at Christmas lunch and the salami on the grazing platter.

However, many of us have heard about a link between processed meats and colorectal cancer, which kills more than 5000 Australians each year. Is this just a myth, or are we putting ourselves at increased cancer risk by including processed meats in our diet?

Australians eat a lot of meat, and a significant proportion of that is processed. According to data from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), we consumed approximately 110 kilograms per person per year in 2018, second only to the United States. Based on the last national diet survey in 2011-12, up to a quarter of the meat consumed has been salted, cured, fermented, smoked or otherwise processed.

Processed meat as a carcinogen

In 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) at the World Health Organization (WHO) assessed over 800 studies to understand the link between processed meats and cancer. The studies excluded other cancer-causing factors like obesity, so that the effect of processed meats could be isolated.

The IARC’s Working Group was chaired by Professor Bernard Stewart from UNSW Medicine & Health, who is an internationally recognised expert in environmental carcinogenesis (cancer causation).

Ultimately the IARC classified processed meat as a carcinogen, meaning they found sufficient evidence that eating processed meats causes colorectal cancer.

So, how does this work? There are several explanations, the first and foremost being nitrites found in processed meat products.

“Processed meat, at least historically, has been processed using sodium nitrite,” Prof. Stewart said. “That nitrite can react with molecules in the body to form N-nitroso compounds, which are cancer-causing substances.”

Cooking processed meat, particularly over high heat or an open flame, can also be part of the problem.

“There are also carcinogens that are not inherently present in the meat but are generated during cooking. For example, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heterocyclic amines (HCAs),” Prof. Stewart said.

Should processed meat carry a warning label?

If processed meat is a carcinogen, should packets of sausages and bacon carry warning labels, like cigarettes? According to Prof. Stewart, it’s not that simple.    

“On the one hand, the evidence concerning cancer causation by consumption of processed meats is as definitive as the evidence that tobacco smoke and asbestos cause lung cancer. On the other hand, the same level of preventative action is in no way warranted.”

Different carcinogens have different levels of impact on cancer risk. For tobacco smoke, the impact is high: the lifetime risk of lung cancer in a non-smoker is 1 per cent and in a heavy smoker it is 25 per cent. However, for someone who consumes processed meat frequently rather than moderately, their lifetime risk of colorectal cancer increases from 5 to 6 per cent.

This means that while there is strong evidence that eating processed meats causes colorectal cancer, the actual impact on cancer risk is relatively small.

Reducing colorectal cancer risk

Although eating salami may not be as dangerous as smoking cigarettes or breathing in asbestos particles, it does contribute to cancer. But there may be ways to counteract the effects of processed meats in your gut – at least partially. This includes eating foods like fruits, vegetables and whole grains.  

Associate Professor Sara Grafenauer from UNSW Medicine & Health, who is an Accredited Practising Dietitian, is researching how eating whole grains may protect against colorectal cancer. Whole grains can have an indirect effect by combating obesity, but also directly prevent carcinogenic activity inside the gut. Importantly, dietary patterns with whole grains could mean prevention of disease, saving millions in healthcare costs.

“The whole grain is a bundle of nutrients that has anti-carcinogenic properties,” A/Prof. Grafenauer said. “It contains many compounds that are stimulating anti-oxidant activity in the gut and are being protective.

“Also, because whole grains are fibrous, they can also bind carcinogens and remove them from the gut.”

So, after considering the risks of eating processed meat, is it ‘safe’ to nibble on salami or order a BLT? The answer is “yes” because a nibble is not the problem. Increased risk of cancer is measurable among people who eat processed meat on a regular and daily basis. With this knowledge, what’s on the menu this summer is for you to decide.

The source of this news is from University of New South Wales

Popular in Research

1

Apr 6, 2024

Conspiracy theory runs wild linking New York City’s 4.8-magnitude earthquake to date of solar eclipse

2

Apr 4, 2024

Five Sydney researchers honoured by Australian Academy of Science

3

Apr 9, 2024

The rise of Dawn

4

Apr 1, 2024

VIU researcher exploring tourism resilience in rural BC communities

5

Apr 4, 2024

Conservative activist Charlie Kirk helped oust Ronna McDaniel at the RNC. Now the knives are out for him.

Fight or flight: Fearful Trump critics weigh the risk of retribution if he's re-elected

1 day ago

MSN

1 day ago

Silence broken on gender pay gaps but we must hold organisations to account

1 day ago

Nasdaq Futures Up 2% as Nvidia Powers Global Rally: Markets Wrap

Apr 8, 2024

Investigating and preserving Quechua

14 hours ago

Biden visits his Pennsylvania hometown to call for more taxes on the rich and cast Trump as elitist

14 hours ago